Need someone to lead product management at your software company? I create software for people that create software and I'm looking for my next opportunity. Check out my resume and get in touch.

Risk and funding

Freshness Warning
This blog post is over 16 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current and the links no longer work.

VentureBeat has a guest piece from Opus Capital’s Carl Showalter on advantages of seed funding at the early stages of a company.

Many startups go out and raise as much as they can get in the first round of financing. This is often before the company has a product, any customers, or even a fully-built team.

An entrepreneur’s risk spans three areas: team, technology and market. They can determine how much funding they need by asking themselves one question: Can a small amount of money dramatically reduce one or more of these risks in six months?

By securing only as much capital as they initially need in a form of a seed round, entrepreneurs do themselves a big favor.

An investor will value your company and his investment based on how much risk he’s taking. A company with little more than an idea is a huge risk. What if they can’t pull off the technology? What if the team fractures when they hit hard times? What if nobody wants the product?

The more you can reduce those risks for the investors, the better your terms will be for your series A. Come out of the gate with a product that a few customers are actually paying for and investors will find you a lot more attractive.

Seed investors have a different investment goal than a VC. Because of the lower amounts of money being invested, a seed investor can invest in more companies. The companies' needs are smaller on both the capital and the attention side, making it possible for a seed investor to spread their money and attention across more entrepreneurs. In doing so, they’re also spreading that risk out more. It’s okay if a few investments don’t pan out, because others will.

Investors providing seed capital will offer much better terms to an unproven startup. Until you’ve proven yourself, don’t go out trying to raise millions of dollars.

Recently Written

Mastery doesn’t come from perfect planning (Dec 21)
In a ceramics class, one group focused on a single perfect dish, while another made many with no quality focus. The result? A lesson in the value of practice over perfection.
The Dark Side of Input Metrics (Nov 27)
Using input metrics in the wrong way can cause unexpected behaviors, stifled creativity, and micromanagement.
Reframe How You Think About Users of your Internal Platform (Nov 13)
Changing from "Customers" to "Partners" will give you a better perspective on internal product development.
Measuring Feature success (Oct 17)
You're building features to solve problems. If you don't know what success looks like, how did you decide on that feature at all?
How I use OKRs (Oct 13)
A description of how I use OKRs to guide a team, written so I can send to future teams.
Build the whole product (Oct 6)
Your code is only part of the product
Input metrics lead to outcomes (Sep 1)
An easy to understand example of using input metrics to track progress toward an outcome.
Lagging Outcomes (Aug 22)
Long-term things often end up off a team's goals because they can't see how to define measurable outcomes for them. Here's how to solve that.

Older...

What I'm Reading

Contact

Adam Kalsey

+1 916 600 2497

Resume

Public Key

© 1999-2024 Adam Kalsey.