Need someone to lead product or development at your software company? I lead product and engineering teams and I'm looking for my next opportunity. Check out my resume and get in touch.

37 Signals -- Small no more?

Freshness Warning
This article is over 13 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

The new mantra at 37 Signals is "getting real" but about this time last year, it was "run small and embrace constraints." I suppose that "getting real" could be an evolution of the idea, but just work with me here.

Late last June, 37 Signals' David Heinemeier Hansson said...

I hope more crews will think hard and consider whether they could do without. Look at the project that costs $100,000 and figure out how to make it cost $20,000 over the shoulders of three guys. Do it out of your own pocket and you’ll be forced to reckon with constraints earlier and more intensely.


Taking cash shouldn’t be a necessity, a goal, or a celebration.

They even inspired Six Apart’s Mena Trott to write a rebuttal of sorts: In Defense of Big.

Today, they made the leap and took outside investment from Jeff Bezos. Does this mean that small and nimble and being successful because of your constraints isn’t working out? It certainly seems that they’ve grown as far as they can on their own bootstraps. Says Jason Fried when announcing the investment...

We’re proud of what we’ve been able to do without outside help. But we think we can do even better with the right kind of help.

I can almost feel the the stress of the conflicted followers of 37 Signals—"if being small isn’t the right thing to do, maybe we shouldn’t get real either..."

Also, note the large number of spam comments on the entry where they talk about not needing money. You really should clean those up, guys. Unless you’re intentionally advertising viagra, dating services, and lost nigerian money.

Jason Fried
July 21, 2006 7:14 AM

Who said anything about not staying small?

Daniel Elmore
July 29, 2006 5:50 PM

I don't think it's very constructive to debate a point with relative words like "small". Maybe 37Signals is planning an app. that other companies would need $5 million to make, but they are going to "get real" and "stay small" by building it with $1 million. Still small, still a lot of money.

This discussion has been closed.

Recently Written

A framework for onboarding new employees (May 15)
There’s no single good way to onboard an employee that works for every role. Here's a framework for creating a process that you can adapt to each situation.
TV hosts as a guide for software managers (May 10)
Software managers can learn a lot from journalists or late night TV hosts and how they interview people.
The Improvement Flywheel (Apr 29)
An incredible flywheel for the improvement of a development team. Fix a few things, and everything starts getting better.
Managers and technical ability (Dec 26)
In technical fields, the closer you are to the actual work being done, the closer your skills need to resemble those of the people doing the work.
Dysfunctions of output-oriented software teams (Sep 17)
Whatever you call it, the symptom is that you're measuring your progress by how much you build and deliver instead of measuring success by the amount of customer value you create.
Evaluative and generative product development (Aug 30)
Customers never even talk to the companies that don't fit their needs at all. If the only product ideas you're considering are those that meet the needs of your current customers, then you're only going to find new customers that look exactly like your current customers.
Product Manager Career Ladder (Aug 19)
What are the steps along the product management career path?
Building the Customer-Informed Product (Aug 15)
Strong products aren't composed of a list of features dictated by customers. They are guided by strong visions, and the execution of that vision is the primary focus of product development.


What I'm Reading


Adam Kalsey

+1 916 600 2497


Public Key

© 1999-2020 Adam Kalsey.