Need someone to lead product management at your software company? I create software for people that create software and I'm looking for my next opportunity. Check out my resume and get in touch.

Related Keywords

Freshness Warning
This blog post is over 21 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current and the links no longer work.

Several people have asked about an MT plugin that creates a related entries list using keywords instead of categories. David Raynes even wrote a plugin that does it.

My Related Entries plugin already does this, and I’ve been using it this way for months. I just haven’t ever written the documentation for this feature. If you’re brave enough to try it without documentation, go download the plugin and try it out. Hint: field="keywords"

One thing to keep in mind, though. Getting related entries by keyword is a lot slower than getting them by category. Your rebuild times will increase if you use the keyword method.

Már Örlygsson
April 15, 2003 12:20 PM

Can you provide more details? How does it deal with a comma-seperated list of keywords, where each keyword may consist of more than one word with spaces in-between?

Adam Kalsey
April 15, 2003 2:17 PM

Keywords are considered to be delimited with commas and listed in order of importance. The keywords for this entry are: related entries, keywords, plugin, movable type The plugin will find the first N entries that match "related entries" and if that number is less than the lastn specified in the MTEntries tag it will move on to "keywords" and so forth. So if you only have 2 entries that have "related entries" as a keyword and your lastn is 3, the plugin will grab those two and then will find entries that have "keywords" as a word.

Már Örlygsson
April 15, 2003 3:20 PM

Excellent! However, I'm still curious. How well does it handle cases when entries have two or more keywords in common? Example: Lets assume that the current entry has the following keywords assigned to it: "dog, cat, horse, parrot". Related Candiate A has: "dog, house, sofa, apple". Related Candiate B has: "sheep, horse, parrot, cat". Which does the search function consider to be more "related" to the current entry - A or B?

Adam Kalsey
April 15, 2003 3:32 PM

Whichever entry is more recent. The plugin doesn't have any sort of scoring logic. It essentially lists the N most recent entries that have a keyword in common. If you use a controlled vocabulary for your keywords, and you often use the same keyword first, then you'll probably find that your entries never look beyond the first keyword in order to find a match.

Trackback from the golden path
April 23, 2003 8:45 PM

About the site

Excerpt: Philiosophy As a discourse between myself and the wider world, the golden path is an unorganized accumulation of hopes, the embodiment of wish. Design notes can be found in the archives of this site itself, but include: February 12, 2003...

May 13, 2003 12:18 PM

> "in order of importance" May i ask, how this order is generated? Who decides what's important?

Adam Kalsey
May 13, 2003 12:46 PM

You do. The plugin assumes that you listed your keywords in the order that you felt was important. You might also consider reading Related Entries Revisted:

September 23, 2003 5:57 AM

and the plugin is absolutly free??

Adam Kalsey
September 24, 2003 4:00 PM

Yes, all my plugins are free, although I'd be happy to take your money if you sent it to me.

Philip Dhingra
September 27, 2003 12:31 AM

Anybody try this with keywords? - for me, this still only shows entries in the same category.

Philip Dhingra
September 27, 2003 3:06 PM

I tried pasting the code I used, i just did mtrelatedentries field="keywords" but it still just only showed related by keywords

Philip Dhingra
September 27, 2003 3:07 PM

I tried pasting the code I used, i just did mtrelatedentries field="keywords" but it still just only showed related by category

Philip Dhingra
September 29, 2003 6:39 PM

Solved my own problem: It only matches other entries that matched that keyword in their keyword field, and not in the entry body

Trackback from Anders Jacobsen's blog
January 21, 2004 6:21 AM

Optimizing Movable Type - Keyword links

Excerpt: In theory, at least, this approach should enable searching for the keywords and still hitting the archived page despite the word not necessarily being written at (or conjugated in the same way) at the page itself.

October 12, 2004 11:26 AM

Using MTRelatedEntries field="keywords" I'm getting relations between keywords & Entry Body. ie. One entry has "art" as a keyword. Another entry has "art" in it's body field. These are now related. This may be good though, as I'm about to implement the related entries revisited dealie. Also, I'm getting the error: splice() offset past end of array at plugins/ line 77

This discussion has been closed.

Recently Written

Great prodct managers own the outcomes (May 14)
Being a product manager means never having to say, "that's not my job."
Too Big To Fail (Apr 9)
When a company piles resources on a new product idea, it doesn't have room to fail. That keeps it from succeeding.
Go small (Apr 4)
The strengths of a large organization are the opposite of what makes innovation work. Starting something new requires that you start with a small team.
Start with a Belief (Apr 1)
You can't use data to build products unless you start with a hypothesis.
Mastery doesn’t come from perfect planning (Dec 21)
In a ceramics class, one group focused on a single perfect dish, while another made many with no quality focus. The result? A lesson in the value of practice over perfection.
The Dark Side of Input Metrics (Nov 27)
Using input metrics in the wrong way can cause unexpected behaviors, stifled creativity, and micromanagement.
Reframe How You Think About Users of your Internal Platform (Nov 13)
Changing from "Customers" to "Partners" will give you a better perspective on internal product development.
Measuring Feature success (Oct 17)
You're building features to solve problems. If you don't know what success looks like, how did you decide on that feature at all?


What I'm Reading


Adam Kalsey

+1 916 600 2497


Public Key

© 1999-2024 Adam Kalsey.