This is the blog of Adam Kalsey. Unusual depth and complexity. Rich, full body with a hint of nutty earthiness.

The Internet is NOT going out of business

People keep asking me about the dot-com dream falling apart and asking if I’m worried.

The companies that are failing are those with business plans that read like my kindergartner’s homework. Those companies that built online businesses based on principles that seem absurd in the offline world are finding out that customers aren’t fundamentally different just because they are online.

140 dot-coms did fail in the US last year, but that is a small percentage of the 1700 that were funded in 1999 (according to numbers from PriceWaterhouseCoopers). Venture capital investments are up from $60 billion in 1999 to $80 billion in the first three quarters of 2000.

As for employment, in August of last year, in the midst of dot-com deaths, Anderson Consulting released a study that estimated that the Internet economy would create 10 million jobs worldwide by 2002. 5.8 million of those will be in the US. In contrast, The Industry Standard’s Layoff Tracker counts only 54,167 job losses as of yesterday.

A report from Cisco and the University of Texas finds that employment in the Internet sector grew 10% between 1999 and 2000 and that the Internet economy directly employs over 3 million people. The same report states that only 9.6% of the Internet economy can be attributed to dot-coms. In fact, the "slowdown" of spring 2000 seems to have hardly affected employment. Nearly as many jobs were created in the first half of 2000 as in all of 1999.

Spending is also up. An InternetWeek survey shows that 77% of companies plan to increase their Internet spending an average of 40% in 2001. The University of Texas study reported that Internet Economy revenues were up 58% in 2000 to $830 billion.

So don’t panic the next time someone says that the Internet Economy is failing just because some company realized they can’t turn a profit by shipping 50 pound bags of dog food to consumers.

Recently Written

Your OKR Cascade is Breaking Your Strategy
Aug 1: Most companies cascade OKRs down their org chart thinking it creates alignment. Instead, it fragments strategy and marginalizes supporting teams. Here's what works better than the waterfall approach.
Your Prioritization Problem Is a Strategy Problem
Jul 23: Most teams struggle with prioritization because they're trying to optimize for everything at once. The real problem isn't having too many options—it's not having a clear strategy to choose between them. Without strategy, every decision feels equally important. With strategy, most decisions become obvious.
Behind schedule
Jul 21: Your team is 6 weeks late and still missing features. The solution isn't working harder—it's accepting that your deadlines were fake all along. Ship what you have. Cut ruthlessly. Stop letting "one more day" turn into one more month.
VC’s Future Lies In Building Winners
Jun 21: AI and megafunds are about to kill the traditional venture model, forcing smaller VCs to stop hunting for hidden gems and start rolling up their sleeves to fix broken companies instead.
Should individual people have OKRs?
May 14: A good OKR describes and measures an outcome, but it can be challenging to create an outcome-focused OKR for an individual.
10 OKR traps and how to avoid them
May 8: I’ve helped lots of teams implement OKRs or fix a broken OKR process. Here are the 10 most common problems I see, and what to do instead.
AI is Smart, But Wisdom Requires Judgement
May 3: AI can process data at lightning speed, but wisdom comes from human judgment—picking the best imperfect option when facts alone don’t point the way.
Decoding Product Leadership Titles
Mar 18: Not all product leadership titles mean what they sound like. ‘Head of Product’ can mean anything from a senior PM to a true VP. Here’s how to tell the difference.

Older...

What I'm Reading