Link buyers get slapped by Google

Freshness Warning
This article is over 11 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

Last summer, I had a bit of a discussion about Text Link Ads, link purchasing, and spamming search engines.

The only difference between this and blog comment spamming is that Text Link Ads is paying the bloggers for polluting their space.

I predicted that Google would eventually take steps to devalue paid links and penalize those who sell them.

Google considers buying plain text links to be a violation of their policies. They aren’t yet docking sites for selling text ads, but if they can’t contain the problem they likely will.

Danny Sullivan noticed that a Stanford site had dropped in PageRank from a 9 to a 7—a substantial drop. He asked Google about it and was told that they have begun penalizing sites that sell links by reducing their PageRank.

I pinged Google, and they confirmed that PageRank scores are being lowered for some sites that sell links.

In addition, Google said that some sites that are selling links may indeed end up being dropped from its search engine or have penalties attached to prevent them from ranking well.

Google may also be lowering page rank for site networks that heavily interlink. When TechCrunch first noticed the PageRank devaluing, Duncan Riley poked around and found that several large blog networks had been affected.

There is some suggestion that the changes may be related to the sale of text link ads, but at this stage this is not backed by evidence, and a range of sites I checked that are selling text link ads were showing no change in page rank.

It’s possible that Duncan’s theory is correct—Google has started slapping down link farms and big blogrolls are getting caught in the process. But it’s important to note that Google has said they’re only slashing PageRank on some link sellers. Danny Sullivan notes that to keep link advertisers guessing, "Google is only decreasing the PageRank for a subset of the sites they actually know about." The rest are presumably being dealt with in other ways, such as delisting from the index entirely, like Text Link Ad’s corporate site.

Bottom line is, if you’re attempting to game search engines, you’ll probably regret it later. As I said in a comment to my original discussion on link buying,

Search engines, especially Google, have shown an eagerness in the past to de-list sites who choose to particpate in link gaming. The coin that you’re making for TLA now won’t seem nearly as attractive once Google knocks you from their listings.


Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.

Name:

Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Best of Newly Digital There have been dozens of Newly Digital entries from all over the world. Here are some of the best.
  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Newly Digital Newly Digital is an experimental writing project. I've asked 11 people to write about their early experiences with computing technology and post their essays on their weblogs. So go read, enjoy, and then contribute. This collection is open to you. Write up your own story, and then let the world know about it.
  • Lock-in is bad T-Mobile thinks they'll get new Hotspot customers with exclusive content and locked-in devices.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.
Handling “I don’t have anything to talk about” in your 1:1s (Dec 21)
When someone says they have nothing to discuss, they’re almost always thinking too narrowly.
What should you talk about in a 1:1? (Dec 19)
Who sets the agenda? What should you discuss, and what should you avoid discussing?

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.