Open Source Content Management still sucks

Freshness Warning
This article is over 14 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

Last July I wrote briefly about some of the problems with open source CMS. Jeff Veen tackles the issue this week and goes a bit more in depth. Like other open source projects the problems seem to all stem from the fact that developers of the products don’t think about the end users enough. They transfer their wants and needs and project them onto the end users. The end result is that the product makes perfect sense to a techie, but is utterly confusing to anyone else. This projection also ensures that the product is inflexible and won’t meet the needs of people who don’t have the same sort of sites as the developers.

Henri Bergius replies to Veen’s article with some specifics about what Midgard is doing.

nexflo
October 7, 2004 11:42 AM

very true.. but thats one of the main problems in the OpenSource community. People dont tackle projects the right way...if you do a project (commercial/free/hobby type doesnt matter)...you should still keep your prospective users in mind. Analyze stuff etc. What commercial CMS u like then?

Adam Kalsey
October 8, 2004 10:47 AM

It depends on your needs, really. Your CMS selection should be led with a serious evaluation of what you need.

Hartvig
October 16, 2004 6:19 AM

Inspired by Bergius I've written a reply on my weblog on how umbraco - the ASP.NET based cms that I'm working for - handles the Veen-stated issues: http://www.090978.org/2004/10/apparently-umbraco-doesnt-suck.html Best, Hartvig...

Robert
December 17, 2004 7:30 AM

I'd love to see some content management that creative departments (artwork, Illustrator, Photoshop) will use. Trying to get these people to keep track of their product is a losing battle. They all seem to have a pile of usb drives, zip drives, external hard drives, etc, and will NEVER be able to get an old piece of artwork back for you. (Not to mention they always use stupid mac formats but that's another rant.)

David
July 17, 2007 12:50 PM

I've had the same problem with open source CMS. we shoipped around and Compass is by far the best CMS out there, priced as montly lease rather than an outright purchase made it very attractive aswell. They have scrrenshots and a demo on their website at http://www.compasswebpublisher.com

Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.

Name:

Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.