Giants kick butt

Freshness Warning
This article is over 14 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

Normally I don’t post about baseball here, which is odd, considering what a huge fan of the game I am. But I had to mention this. The Card’s Matt Morris shut the Giants out last time he pitched against them, but after giving up 8 runs in the first inning tonight he’s already been replaced. From a shutout to only going 2/3 of an inning.

Ouch.

The Giants have shown an inability to hold onto a lead the last few weeks, so we’ll see if the 8-0 lead does them a bit of good, especially with Rueter on the mound.

Update: I was almost right. The Giants managed to let the Cardinals run the score to 8-7 with the winning run up to bat in the 9th. They managed to barely hold on.

Tom
August 3, 2004 8:21 AM

I am doing research on consulting firm websites and being from St. Louis, the headline, "Giants kick butt" caught my eye after reading the subhead. I think the headline should have read, "Giants just squeak by with a win". The Cards outplayed them all weekend even though we didn't sweep them. Even though matt morris had a horrific 2/3 of an inning, our bullpen completely shut the giants down. The Cards proved that you do not have to back down from Barry. He is human just like the rest of us, he can just hit a foul ball a mile. By the way, interesting site. Thanks, Tom

Adam Kalsey
August 3, 2004 9:22 AM

I posted that in the first inning when Morris had just been pulled out. You'll note that I said the Giants have shown an inability to hold onto a lead and would probably blow the 8-0 lead. They nearly did. Offensively SF is doing terrific. In the games that they lose they are scoring 4+ runs. Normally that would be enough to win some games, but their relievers are giving up too many late-inning runs. The Giants bullpen is exhausted. With the exceptopn of Schmidt the starters can't consistently go more than five or six innings. I'm afraid that trading Felix Rodriugez (one of the best relievers in baseball) for more offense (Ledee was picked up because the Giants don't hit well against right-handed pitchers and Ledee does) was a grave mistake. What the Giants really need is pitching. They need a couple of strong starters to replace Hermanson and Rueter. One of those pitchers could be moved to the bullpen and the other traded away. Hermanson would probably be more effective as a reliever than Woody.

Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.

Name:

Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.