California Government CSS Design

Freshness Warning
This article is over 15 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

CalGrants.org, a site that I’ve been working on for the last couple of months has finally launched after many rounds of revisions and copy edits. The site was built in conjunction with design firm THOMAS|ferrous and PR firm Runyon Saltzman & Einhorn. As far as I know, this is the first California state government site that is designed with entirely CSS layout techniques.

The site features an accessible design that allows screen readers, PDAs, and non-graphic browsers to have full access to the content while providing a rich graphic experience to others. All text is resizable and the layout flows to accommodate the size changes.

The headings use a replacement technique that swaps out text headings for graphics in browsers that support it. All non-content images are pulled in through CSS, getting design elements out of the HTML entirely. Since pages of the site are intended to be printed, a print stylesheet was crafted to ensure a quality printed page.

Here’s proof that a CSS site doesn’t need to be the boxy, minimalist designs that are often shown as examples.

Chris Vance
November 21, 2003 10:14 PM

Wow, very well done. The pages flow nicely in Lynx, with the navigation at the bottom (which surpised me until I looked at the page source). The only minor thing I noticed was that on the Testimonials page, the comma after the "Executive Director for the California Student Aid Commission" is within the STRONG element, while the comma after Kim Chueh's "Actress" is outside the STRONG element (this is easier to see in Lynx, when bold items (eg. strong and b) are colored differently to separate them from surrounding text. However, this is just nitpicking. :-) In IE 6/Win, does anyone else notice a thin vertical bar (an artifact, apparently) just to the right of the menu_bottom gif image at the bottom of the page navigation? It appears after IE loads the image... I have to congratulate you and the others involved with the project; the site is very well executed, accessible, and polished (just look at the print styles). Excellent work.

Michael Kear
November 24, 2003 4:12 AM

Excellent site. It shows what can be done by learning and implementing standards. You might like to look at the sponsors page in Opera though. In Opera7.1 all the logos piled on top of one another instead of being laid out in a nice 3-column table as they are in IE. Other than that, it's fast as a flash, and easy to navigate. Nice job.

Jon Holden
December 2, 2003 4:55 PM

While not a State agency, we are a Federal agency in CA. Does that count? Our site is also 100% CSS, and has been for some time. This is also a rare within the Federal government, as is the concept of Section508 and accessibility. One of the big payoffs in converting our site to CSS was that most of my pages immediately met Level 3 of the WAI without any additional work.

This discussion has been closed.

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.