Is this the end?

Freshness Warning
This article is over 16 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

For months, I’ve laughed in the face of spam. I’ve bared my email address in public, daring the spammers to come and find me. "Let the spam flow," I cried, for I was prepared. I had SpamAssassin on my side.

In the last 5 months, SpamAssassin has caught over 60MB of spam wih nary a false positive or spam slipping through. But now chinks have appeared in my armor. In the last half-hour, four spams have slipped through. Each one was scored just under the five points required in order for a message to be tagged as spam.

Johan Svensson
January 23, 2003 4:44 AM

Personally, I run SpamProbe (spamprobe.sf.net), that uses bayesian logic. For all the recent hype about the Bayes formula, it's damn good. Unfortunately (heh) I don't get any spam at all to my domain, so I had to import a bunch of hotmail spam to train the filter. Sure, after about 300 messages from hotmail, it picked up every piece of spam originating from my hotmail account and nuked it. Though of course, many spams there tend to be repeated messages. Paul Graham's latest paper sounds promising, and adds a new layer to the previously completely naive filter; his suggestion is to differ between different headers, the body and URLs in the message. Personally, I think a system based on bayesian logic is the way to go. It's not the Be All, End All of spam preventing, but it's so incredibly effective that it's a bad idea not to have it among your filters. I've noticed that some of the hotmail spam I've gotten recently have changed style -- it's a short sentence with non-spammy words followed by a URL. That's certainly not much for SpamAssassin to chew on.

Adam Kalsey
January 24, 2003 12:39 PM

The latest SpamAssassin (2.5) has Bayesian filtering built in. I'm still running 2.43, though, because I wnat to make sure that the new release is stable before updating my servers.

andersja
January 24, 2003 3:15 PM

... it's the classig problem of filtering systems with feedback mechanisms... It seems the only way to keep up is to install new versions of SA before the spammers do... Despite the odd slip-through, I couldn't imagine living without it... It catches 1000+ messages for me a month... There are commercial products available that I can't imagine being nearly as thorough as SA and bing sold for massive sums... See also: http://www.jacobsen.no/anders/blog/archives/2002/08/23/is_spamassassin_helping_the_spammers_too_much.html http://www.jacobsen.no/anders/blog/archives/2002/08/28/to_filter_or_not_to_filter.html http://www.jacobsen.no/anders/blog/archives/2002/10/16/spam_hype_and_spamassassin.html

Johan Svensson
January 24, 2003 5:51 PM

It's not that I don't like spamassassin - I used it before switching to spamprobe. It's just that spamassassin is a bit resource hungry and takes longer time due to hostname lookups and such. That's stuff I can live without -- spamprobe includes the headers and server names when analyzing the mail anyway. though of course, I used to run spamassassin on an old Cyrix 100MHz laptop with a whopping 16 megs of RAM. :-)

Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.

Name:

Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • Rounded corners in CSS There lots of ways to create rounded corners with CSS, but they always require lots of complex HTML and CSS. This is simpler.
  • The mouse and me Not only is the mouse very destructive, but it's evaded all attempts to capture or kill it so far.
  • Embrace the medium The Web is different than print, television, or any other medium. To be successful, designers must embrace those differences.
  • Let it go Netscape 4 is six years old.
  • Newly Digital Newly Digital is an experimental writing project. I've asked 11 people to write about their early experiences with computing technology and post their essays on their weblogs. So go read, enjoy, and then contribute. This collection is open to you. Write up your own story, and then let the world know about it.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Product Manager Career Ladder (Aug 19)
What are the steps along the product management career path?
Building the Customer-Informed Product (Aug 15)
Strong products aren't composed of a list of features dictated by customers. They are guided by strong visions, and the execution of that vision is the primary focus of product development.
Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.