Plug Hollywood's hole

Freshness Warning
This article is over 17 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

The EFF’s Cory Doctorow has written a wonderful description of Hollywood’s attempt to alter the way our lives work in orde to avoid having to change their businesses. Doctorow’s article explains highly technical and legal concepts in simple terms.

For instance, he writes that if Hollywood gets its way and digital converters are regulated "you might end up with a cellphone that switches itself off when you get within range of the copyrighted music on your stereo [or] a camcorder that refuses to store your child’s first steps because he is taking them within eyeshot of a television playing a copyrighted cartoon."

Hollywood is pushing for laws regulating everything from the Internet to common electronic components to ensure that you aren’t able to make unauthorized copies of copyrighted materials. Can you think of another case in which the construction of an item is regulated to prevent it from being used to break the law? Imagine if automobiles contained speed sensors and electronic eyes that prevented you from exceeding the speed limit, rolling through a stop sign, or parking in a no-parking zone.

Hollywood is doing this because they are scared. New technology that has the potential to disrupt their business model is being created at a rapid pace. Never before has there been this many threats to their control over how their product is distrubuted and consumed. Consumers are now able to listen to music and watch movies and television when and how they want to, not how the studios want them to.

It is understandable that the industry is frightened. For decades they were in control but that control has been disrupted. Now that the consumer has begun to wrest some of that control away, they need to change the entire way they package, market and sell their product in order to remain successful.

Or they can legislate the disruption away.

Read Consensus at Lawyerpoint: Hollywood Wants to Plug the "Analog Hole".

Adam Kalsey
June 18, 2002 8:23 PM

Update: Zimran calls using the law to prevent your business from changing "injunctive relief from the future." I like that.

Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.


Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives


Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.


Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT

Twitter, etc: akalsey



©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.