Maniacal Focus

Freshness Warning
This article is over 17 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

If your company has a competitive weakness, you should make it your number one priority to overcome that weakness. Even better is to turn it around and make it a strength.

A few years ago Microsoft recognized that the Internet was becoming an important part of computing. They also realized that their Internet offerings were weak. In a series of memos, Bill Gates decreed that the Internet was the single focus for Microsoft. Internet Explorer went from being a second rate browser to the best and most used browser. Office allows Web collaboration. The XBox is poised to become a hub that connects all home computing devices together and to the Internet. Passport has aims to become the login screen for millions of Web sites. Microsoft attacked their weakness with determination and turned it into an advantage.

Now Microsoft has confessed to the security problems with their products. Brian Valentine has been tasked with not only improving the security of Microsoft products, but with improving the security of the computing industry as a whole. Better Living Through Software says "Brian is famous internally for being a 'hammer guy.' That is, he is the 50,000 pound daisycutter bomb that gets dropped when you absolutely cannot afford to miss."

A leaked memo from Bill Gates has echoes of his Internet focus emails. Security is "more important than any other part of our work. When we face a choice between adding features and resolving security issues, we need to choose security. Our products should emphasize security right out of the box."

Your organization should take a clue from Gates and company. Recognize your weaknesses. Acknowledge them. And then put aside all else and focus on eliminating them.

Update: Wired News has the entire text of the Bill Gates security memo.

Steven Garrity
January 19, 2002 12:32 PM

I think Bill Gates' apparent control over his company is fascinating. Even the Bill-Gates-is-Satan crowd would have to admit that, for better or worse, his 1997 shift to the internet has been rediculously successful. I would recommend reading Douglas Copeland's Microserfs - it's more about about characters than it is about Microsoft, but if you find the behemoth strangly interesting like I do, you might enjoy it.

Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.


Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives


Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.


Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT

Twitter, etc: akalsey



©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.