Test data mishap

Freshness Warning
This article is over 14 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

25 Nov 2004

Make sure your developers use test data that’s clean and wouldn’t embarass your company if it accidentally slips out to the public. Otherwise you might end up with something like this.

Target.com Product detail page for 'Marijuana'

Update: Apparently this isn’t a test data problem. It’s a problem with not enough product details and the way the ecommerce system’s back end works. The item in question is a book that Amazon carries, but Amazon has no details on the book. Since Target.com is managed by Amazon, many of the products sold by Amazon can be forced to show in the Target.com design; just tack the ASIN from Amazon onto the Target URL. For instance, you buy Isaac Mizrahi cashmere gloves from Target.com even though your local Target isn’t going to carry this item.

When the book is shown on Amazon, it’s obvious that Amazon is selling a book entitled “Marijuana,” but when shown through Target’s interface it just looks like they’re selling pot.

Serge K. Keller
November 26, 2004 12:26 AM

But there's even worse on that site! See http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2004/11/22/targets-backdoor-sale/ for (gory) details...

Trackback from Amanita.net
November 28, 2004 9:14 AM

links for 2004-11-28

Excerpt: Test Data Mishap So how much pot are they selling for $25? (categories: corporate funny) Science Textbook Disclaimers Wow, scary. But hey, it beats...

Kenneth Norton
November 28, 2004 11:55 AM

It's a real book, not test data. From Amazon's site you can see the ISBN number: 0823916839. Lots of merchants sell the hardcover version: http://shopping.yahoo.com/p:Marijuana:1976247212:isbn=0823930076

Chloe
November 28, 2004 3:43 PM

The first incident was funny, I'll grant... But now it's just old news. The first thing that comes to mind is that certain people are deliberately looking for things that slipped through target.com's weakness there, just to play the joke for all it's worth. Thanks for the rather rational explanation, even though I doubt it'll quell the enthusiasm for people who are still getting a rise out of the topic. haha. I doubt it seems particularly embarrassing to Target anyway, actually. After all, people constantly make fun of Wal-Mart for all sorts of reasons, and they like the attention, good or bad. hah! Perhaps Target is different, but I somehow doubt it.

Trackback from smart brother
December 3, 2004 12:57 PM

I didn't know they legalized it already.

Excerpt: Test data mishap :: Adam Kalsey Track


Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.

Name:

Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.