Risk and funding

Freshness Warning
This article is over 11 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

VentureBeat has a guest piece from Opus Capital’s Carl Showalter on advantages of seed funding at the early stages of a company.

Many startups go out and raise as much as they can get in the first round of financing. This is often before the company has a product, any customers, or even a fully-built team.

An entrepreneur’s risk spans three areas: team, technology and market. They can determine how much funding they need by asking themselves one question: Can a small amount of money dramatically reduce one or more of these risks in six months?

By securing only as much capital as they initially need in a form of a seed round, entrepreneurs do themselves a big favor.

An investor will value your company and his investment based on how much risk he’s taking. A company with little more than an idea is a huge risk. What if they can’t pull off the technology? What if the team fractures when they hit hard times? What if nobody wants the product?

The more you can reduce those risks for the investors, the better your terms will be for your series A. Come out of the gate with a product that a few customers are actually paying for and investors will find you a lot more attractive.

Seed investors have a different investment goal than a VC. Because of the lower amounts of money being invested, a seed investor can invest in more companies. The companies' needs are smaller on both the capital and the attention side, making it possible for a seed investor to spread their money and attention across more entrepreneurs. In doing so, they’re also spreading that risk out more. It’s okay if a few investments don’t pan out, because others will.

Investors providing seed capital will offer much better terms to an unproven startup. Until you’ve proven yourself, don’t go out trying to raise millions of dollars.


Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.

Name:

Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.