Need someone to lead product management at your software company? I create software for people that create software and I'm looking for my next opportunity. Check out my resume and get in touch.

37 Signals -- Small no more?

Freshness Warning
This blog post is over 17 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current and the links no longer work.

The new mantra at 37 Signals is "getting real" but about this time last year, it was "run small and embrace constraints." I suppose that "getting real" could be an evolution of the idea, but just work with me here.

Late last June, 37 Signals' David Heinemeier Hansson said...

I hope more crews will think hard and consider whether they could do without. Look at the project that costs $100,000 and figure out how to make it cost $20,000 over the shoulders of three guys. Do it out of your own pocket and you’ll be forced to reckon with constraints earlier and more intensely.

...

Taking cash shouldn’t be a necessity, a goal, or a celebration.

They even inspired Six Apart’s Mena Trott to write a rebuttal of sorts: In Defense of Big.

Today, they made the leap and took outside investment from Jeff Bezos. Does this mean that small and nimble and being successful because of your constraints isn’t working out? It certainly seems that they’ve grown as far as they can on their own bootstraps. Says Jason Fried when announcing the investment...

We’re proud of what we’ve been able to do without outside help. But we think we can do even better with the right kind of help.

I can almost feel the the stress of the conflicted followers of 37 Signals—"if being small isn’t the right thing to do, maybe we shouldn’t get real either..."

Also, note the large number of spam comments on the entry where they talk about not needing money. You really should clean those up, guys. Unless you’re intentionally advertising viagra, dating services, and lost nigerian money.

Jason Fried
July 21, 2006 7:14 AM

Who said anything about not staying small?

Daniel Elmore
July 29, 2006 5:50 PM

I don't think it's very constructive to debate a point with relative words like "small". Maybe 37Signals is planning an app. that other companies would need $5 million to make, but they are going to "get real" and "stay small" by building it with $1 million. Still small, still a lot of money.

This discussion has been closed.

Recently Written

Mastery doesn’t come from perfect planning (Dec 21)
In a ceramics class, one group focused on a single perfect dish, while another made many with no quality focus. The result? A lesson in the value of practice over perfection.
The Dark Side of Input Metrics (Nov 27)
Using input metrics in the wrong way can cause unexpected behaviors, stifled creativity, and micromanagement.
Reframe How You Think About Users of your Internal Platform (Nov 13)
Changing from "Customers" to "Partners" will give you a better perspective on internal product development.
Measuring Feature success (Oct 17)
You're building features to solve problems. If you don't know what success looks like, how did you decide on that feature at all?
How I use OKRs (Oct 13)
A description of how I use OKRs to guide a team, written so I can send to future teams.
Build the whole product (Oct 6)
Your code is only part of the product
Input metrics lead to outcomes (Sep 1)
An easy to understand example of using input metrics to track progress toward an outcome.
Lagging Outcomes (Aug 22)
Long-term things often end up off a team's goals because they can't see how to define measurable outcomes for them. Here's how to solve that.

Older...

What I'm Reading

Contact

Adam Kalsey

+1 916 600 2497

Resume

Public Key

© 1999-2024 Adam Kalsey.