Spam Spell Checker

Freshness Warning
This article is over 15 years old. It's possible that the information you read below isn't current.

Here’s a freebie idea to anyone that wants it. Most of the spam that sneaks into my inbox past SpamAssassin and my Bayesian spam filter gets there because almost every word in the message is intentionally misspelled. By not giving the filter recognizable content, the messages get past. So how about a spam filter that works by spell check? If more than 50% of the words are misspelled, there’s a good bet that the message is spam or in a language I can’t read anyway.

BillSaysThis
June 26, 2003 10:47 AM

Very cool idea! I would love to improve the efficiency of my filter and at the same time deprive these jizzbots of a valuable tool.

Cal
June 26, 2003 11:49 AM

Unfortunately, I've got a few friends who probably spell over half the words in their emails wrong.

Adam Kalsey
June 26, 2003 12:04 PM

That's what whitelists are for.

Phil Ringnalda
June 26, 2003 9:08 PM

I was thinking that, rather than false positives, those would just be quite acceptable collateral damage. Maybe bounce based on a whitelist, to give actual humans a chance to think about the error of their ways...

Roger Patton
January 8, 2006 6:37 PM

This is a great idea. To address the issue of friends e-mail getting caught in the filter one could have a slide bar which could set the acceptable number of spelling errors before kicking in out as spam.

Roger Patton
January 8, 2006 6:38 PM

This is a great idea. To address the issue of friends e-mail getting caught in the filter one could have a slide bar which could set the acceptable number of spelling errors before kicking it out as spam.

Max
April 14, 2006 4:32 AM

I was searching the net for a program based on this idea when I came across this blog. Unfortunately, much of the misspelling falls far under 50%. They only need to misspell the words that would tend to trigger the filter (such as "Viagra", "discount", etc.). The email that caused me to look for such a program only needed to misspell 3.7 percent of its words in order to fool my installation of spampal and a server level spam filter. This program would need to be able to whitelist my address book so all my spelling challenged friends don't get caught. Another feature that needs to be added is for spam that puts no words in the text and one picture with the spam message. Another solution is to tattoo misspelled words all over convicted spammer's bodies in addition to their prison time. By the way, this post had 7% misspelled words before I spell checked it.

Paul
September 6, 2006 9:20 AM

I was looking for this as a solution also and found this blog. I was hoping that someone would have put it into practice by now. I would be satisfied if they would just spell check the subject line, a single typo would be my trigger. And I think if our spelling challenged friends using computers to send email can't find the spell checker they need a different kind of help. Why should we have to accept poor grammar and spelling? I’m tired of being PC in a world where I am under attack from all sides. Besides I've found my spelling has improved since I make it a point to use a checker. I'm not perfect but as Mary Poppins once said: "Practice doesn't make perfect, Perfect practice makes perfect." (BTW: ‘blog’ fails the spell check.)

tom dickson
March 7, 2008 1:44 PM

I've yet to have new idea that someone else hasn't had years, if not centuries, before me ... like this one ... I presently accept mail directly into my inbox from two groups: those in my address book, and previous recipients ... others get either redirected or deleted depending on what tests they pass or failed ... it it were available, spellcheck would be one of these tests

Mark Hampton
July 3, 2008 1:51 AM

Rather than rejecting on a spellcheck why not run a spellcheck and fix the spelling mistakes automatically before running the message through the SPAM filter ?

Your comments:

Text only, no HTML. URLs will automatically be converted to links. Your email address is required, but it will not be displayed on the site.

Name:

Not your company or your SEO link. Comments without a real name will be deleted as spam.

Email: (not displayed)

If you don't feel comfortable giving me your real email address, don't expect me to feel comfortable publishing your comment.

Website (optional):

Follow me on Twitter

Best Of

  • How not to apply for a job Applying for a job isn't that hard, but it does take some minimal effort and common sense.
  • Movie marketing on a budget Mark Cuban's looking for more cost effective ways to market movies.
  • California State Fair The California State Fair lets you buy tickets in advance from their Web site. That's good. But the site is a horror house of usability problems.
  • Customer reference questions. Sample questions to ask customer references when choosing a software vendor.
  • Comment Spam Manifesto Spammers are hereby put on notice. Your comments are not welcome. If the purpose behind your comment is to advertise yourself, your Web site, or a product that you are affiliated with, that comment is spam and will not be tolerated. We will hit you where it hurts by attacking your source of income.
  • More of the best »

Recently Read

Get More

Subscribe | Archives

Recently

Assumptions and project planning (Feb 18)
When your assumptions change, it's reasonable that your project plans and needs change as well. But too many managers are afraid to go back and re-work a plan that they've already agreed to.
Feature voting is harmful to your product (Feb 7)
There's a lot of problems with using feature voting to drive your product.
Encouraging 1:1s from other managers in your organization (Jan 4)
If you’re managing other managers, encourage them to hold their own 1:1s. It’s such an important tool for managing and leading that everyone needs to be holding them.
One on One Meetings - a collection of posts about 1:1s (Jan 2)
A collection of all my writing on 1:1s
Are 1:1s confidential? (Jan 2)
Is the discussion that occurs in a 1:1 confidential, even if no agreed in the meeting to keep it so?
Skip-level 1:1s are your hidden superpower (Jan 1)
Holding 1:1s with peers and with people far below you on the reporting chain will open your eyes up to what’s really going on in your business.
Do you need a 1:1 if you’re regularly communicating with your team? (Dec 28)
You’re simply not having deep meaningful conversation about the process of work in hallway conversations or in your chat apps.
What agenda items should a manager bring to a 1:1? (Dec 23)
At least 80% of a 1:1 agenda should be driven by your report, but if you also to use this time to work on things with them, then you’ll have better meetings.

Subscribe to this site's feed.

Contact

Adam Kalsey

Mobile: 916.600.2497

Email: adam AT kalsey.com

Twitter, etc: akalsey

Resume

PGP Key

©1999-2019 Adam Kalsey.